Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Features
  • Editorial
  • City Hall Daily
  • Job Board
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Video
  • Events
  • Home / Articles / City Hall Daily / City Hall Daily /  With Nassau Losses, Some Democrats Sing Blues For Jay Jacobs
    . . . . . . .
    Sunday, November 15,2009

    With Nassau Losses, Some Democrats Sing Blues For Jay Jacobs

    Cuomo seen as empowered by stumbles of Paterson pick, may re-elevate O’Neill

    By Sal Gentile

    The election returns from Nassau this month were bad for Tom Suozzi.

    But they may be even worse for Jay Jacobs.

    Jacobs, the Nassau Democratic chairman, was installed as the leader of the state party in September based largely on the impressive gains he had masterminded in his home county.

    Now, some Democrats are wondering if Jacobs is up to the task.

    “Jay’s going to be under a hell of a lot of pressure,” said one State Senate Democratic official who works closely with Jacobs “If he can’t deliver the Senate next year, that’s going to be two huge strikes against him. But I don’t know if he can recover.”

    When Jacobs was chosen to lead the state party in September, he had a sterling record in Nassau. Under his watch, Democrats had taken control of the county legislature and all but one countywide office. Those victories bolstered Jacobs’ credentials as a strategist and fund-raiser, and he routinely advertised them to potential donors and candidates.

    “He talked about the success he had in Nassau County—the Legislature, the county executive, and of course fund-raising, he’s done a tremendous job fund-raising in Nassau County—and how he hopes to do the same thing at the state level,” said one Democratic fundraiser who participated in a recent meet-and-greet with Jacobs. “Now he’s lost the Legislature and now he’s lost the county executive. If he was up for state chair now, who knows if he would be the state chair.”

    Party insiders point to an embarrassing series of missteps and tactical blunders that led to those losses, which they say may weaken the faith of rank-and-file Democrats—not to mention donors and potential candidates—in Jacobs’ leadership.

    For months, Suozzi and Jacobs dismissed polls showing the county executive hovering just below 50 percent, according to people who have spoken with them. And the Democratic get-out-the-vote machine seems to have faltered as well, with most precincts reporting Democratic turnout at one-third less than that of the beleaguered Republicans.

    Perhaps the most humiliating mistake, many Democrats say, was the decision by Suozzi to leave more than $2 million tucked away in his campaign account, anticipating a statewide run next year. Suozzi now trails in an ongoing recount, and several marginal county legislators were unseated—including one who lost by just a handful of votes.

    “They ran a sloppy and lazy and unfocused campaign,” said Larry Levy, the director of the National Center for Suburban Studies at Hofstra University.

    These are the kinds of missteps that Democratic county leaders had come to expect from the state party, which has seen its once-powerful machinery largely collapse in recent years.

    In an interview, Jacobs said that he hoped the results would not discourage Democratic activists and donors from trusting his leadership of the state party.

    “I don’t think that I was selected necessarily because I had a great track record,” he said. “Hopefully nobody is expected to have a multitude of perfect seasons. There are going to be setbacks.”

    He added that the results would make him a better state leader in one respect: he has now experienced first-hand what happens when voters are angry with their elected officials.

    Jacobs said he intended to relay that message to Democratic leaders in Albany.

    “I assure you that, having suffered this loss … it gives me a certain measure of credibility in saying, ‘I have seen what happens when we have an angry electorate,’” he said. “We have to prepare for 2010 in ways that are going to ensure that we don’t see this kind of result again.”

    Supporters of Andrew Cuomo also suggest that the attorney general and all-but-declared gubernatorial candidate may be one of the unintended beneficiaries of the Nassau Democrats’ losses, given that Jacobs is seen as a fierce ally of the governor.

    “He’s clearly a Paterson guy,” said one Cuomo supporter and fundraiser.

    Jacobs’ defeat in Nassau and the looming loss of his close ally, Suozzi, may make it easier for Cuomo’s operatives to push back against him. Some Democrats even speculated that Cuomo could re-elevate Jacobs’ predecessor, June O’Neill, who is now the party’s second-in-command. O’Neill is a confidant and supporter of Cuomo, and seen as sympathetic to his gubernatorial ambitions.

    “She’s got strong ties to the Cuomos,” said one Democrat close to O’Neill, adding, “It’s only a stone’s throw to the election.”
    Share
    • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
     
    And O'Neill just keeps on winning elections. National sources, including the White House, widely credit her for the historic win in NY 23, where Bill Owens became the first Democrat to represent that district since the Civil War. Andrew is shrewd, he knows a winner when he sees one.

     

     
     
    Sign up for Daily News Updates
    Video

    On the Record with Jon Liu—Wednesday February 24, 2010

    DIGITAL EDITION

    User Profile
     
     

    © Copyright © 2009 City Hall and Manhattan Media. All Rights Reserved.

     
    Close
    Close